Drawing for ENERGETICA

USPTO serial 79021467

ENERGETICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SLIE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGETICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Photovoltaic modules and electrical engineering installations as far as not included in other classes, exploiting solar powerSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 9, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance