Drawing for DYNAMIC FRESH SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79021473

DYNAMIC FRESH SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3216023Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 6, 2007
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAMIC FRESH SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Steiner,

Mark A. Steiner, Duane Morris LLPSpear Tower, One Market Plaza, Ste. 2200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1127UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Refrigerating machines and freezers, industrial refrigerators, blast chillers and shock freezers for food and beverage, air conditioners, air purifiers and water coolersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 8, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 31, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 6, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 3, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 3, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 3, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 20, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance