USPTO serial 79021474
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Bee Cheng Hiang Hup Chong; Foodstuff Pte Ltd
Singapore, SG
Other trademarks owned by Bee Cheng Hiang Hup Chong; Foodstuff Pte Ltd
Bee Cheng Hiang Hup Chong; Foodstuff Pte Ltd
Singapore, SG
Other trademarks owned by Bee Cheng Hiang Hup Chong; Foodstuff Pte Ltd
Bee Cheng Hiang Hup Chong; Foodstuff Pte Ltd
Singapore, SG
Other trademarks owned by Bee Cheng Hiang Hup Chong; Foodstuff Pte Ltd
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring food and beverage products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |