USPTO serial 79021517
CITTASLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITTASLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Advertising)-- to promote and publicize events organized by Cittasow or others in accordance with Cittaslow's principles | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | (Telecommunications)-- to diffuse news about Citbslow, the associates Municipality and every event relating its objectives and purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Education)-- to conduct seminars, conferences, workshops about environment, culture, health, food, drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | (Food and Drinks)-- to promote local food and drinks and discover the local culinary traditions, also through tasting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASSOCIAZIONE CITTASLOW -; RETE DEL BUON VIVERE
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CITTASLOW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 28, 2010 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |