USPTO serial 79021535
VICTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3458160Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2008
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VICTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Lawn mowers, agricultural machinery, implements and apparatus, namely, grass cutting machines, power lawn and garden tools, chippers, shredders, and blowers; industrial engines, namely, two-stroke and four-stroke cycle machine engines; engine and motors for boats inclusive of outboard motors; engine components, namely, engine valves, valve train components, and valve train apparatuses; washing machines for household purposes, dishwashing machines, and parts thereof, none of the foregoing being valve operated machines, apparatus or appliances | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 28, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |