USPTO serial 79021576
UNIPLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3362625Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNIPLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
OTTO O. LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP12 SOUTH FIRST STREET12TH FLOORSAN JOSE, CA 95113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Stamped metal for use in molding; stamped metal molds; metal frames for molding made from stamped metal shapes; metal foundry molds; foundry molds of metal; metal molds for casting plastics; metallic molds for casting plastic materials; molds of metal for forming concrete fabrications; metallic column molds for casting plastics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Optical display lenses adapted for use on mobile phone screens; optical lenses; structural parts, namely, housings and plastic housings, all for electrical and electronic apparatus, namely, cell phones, portable media players, computer peripherals, computer hardware and medical diagnostic computer hardware; optical lenses for electrical apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom assembling of plastic, glass and metal components for others; custom plastic injection molding services, namely, parts molding; molding of plastics; contract molding services; pattern printing; silkscreen printing; application of protective coatings to surfaces using the physical vapor deposition process, the plasma process, the vacuum deposition process and the T-die coating process; application of protective thin film coatings to optical components; treatment of plastic materials to produce plastic moldings in the field of mobile handsets, the telecommunications industry, consumer electronics, interior components of automobiles, and the medical industry; printing, namely, gravure printing, flexoprinting and pad printing; custom assembling of molds and tools in the field of injection molding for others; metal stamping; metal tempering | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNIPLAS ENTERPRISES PTE LTD
- Other trademarks owned by UNIPLAS ENTERPRISES PTE LTD
- Other trademarks owned by UNIPLAS ENTERPRISES PTE LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named UNIPLAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |