Drawing for SUPERCHIMS

USPTO serial 79021589

SUPERCHIMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERCHIMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Clay barbecues and outdoor baking ovens all in ornamental form; chimeneas, namely outdoor baking ovens and outdoor fireplacesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Jul 29, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 14, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 16, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 13, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 13, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 16, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 13, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance