USPTO serial 79021594
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Shapiro
MARY L SHAPIRO TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Extruded hard metal rods being parts of machines and drilling tools, saw teeth being parts of sawing machines, power paper cutters for paper machining, tools for forming machines and technology being parts of forming machines, rolling machines, drawing machines, punching machines and forming machines, wearing parts of hard metal, cement, ceramics and super hard materials for machine tools, tool systems comprising tool holders and cutting, turning, milling, boring and drilling inserts, bits and blades to be inserted in the tool holders, clamping tools for power operated machines for tool and work piece clamping, automated tool systems comprising tool holders and cutting tools, cutting machine tools for processing metal and plastics, namely, turning tools, plug-in tools, thread cutting tools, borers, milling machines, milling cutters, power operated saws, friction tools, sink tools and parts for the aforesaid machine tools, namely, replaceable cutters of high-speed steel, hard metal, synthetic, ceramic and other cutting materials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Operating and storage devices, namely tool cabinets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring computer programs and software for logistics, namely, tool management systems, machine control and commercial functional areas used in connection with the Internet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical support and applications consultancy, namely process and tool designing for cutting machine tools for processing metal and plastic, namely turning tools, plug-in tools, thread cutting tools, borers, milling machines, milling cutters, saws, friction tools, sink tools, parts for the aforesaid tools, namely replaceable cutters of high-speed steel, hard metal, synthetic, ceramic or other cutting materials, extruded hard metal rods, saw teeth, paper cutters, tools for forming technology, working parts of hard metal, cermets, ceramic and super hard materials, tool systems, design and development of online computer programs and software for logistics, tool management systems, machine control and commercial function areas, namely those used in connection with the Internet and e-commerce; technical support services, namely trouble shooting of computer hardware and software problems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |