Drawing for ORKIDE

USPTO serial 79021603

ORKIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3206447Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 6, 2007
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORKIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. EGBERT

JOHN S EGBERT & JEREMY CRAFT GRUP OFIS MARKA PATENTATATURK BULVARI 211/11ANKARA, 06680TURKEY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Eggs, milk, and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurtSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 20, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 9, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 26, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 5, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 6, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Dec 14, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 20, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Nov 20, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 13, 2010RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 23, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 13, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance