USPTO serial 79021609
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FI-37100 Nokia, FI
FI-37100 Nokia, FI
Nokia, FI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
Scott S. Havlick Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | heavy tires for agricultural, forestry, material handling, earth moving and road maintenance equipment | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |