USPTO serial 79021652
MELIODERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3302740Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2007
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MELIODERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH
NL
NL
CH
CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott L.L.C.50 South 16th StreetTwo Liberty Place, 22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102-2516Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | [ Paints, varnishes, lacquers; rust preventatives in the nature of a coating; wood preservatives which protect against the deterioration of wood in the nature of a coating; colorants for general industrial use; mordants for use in the chemical industry; raw natural resins for use in the manufacture and treatment of resins and for general industrial use; metals in foil and powder form for painters, decorators, printers and artists; ] colorants for use in manufacturing leather products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLARIANT AG
- Other trademarks owned by Muno International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Stahl International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CLARIANT AG
- Other trademarks owned by CLARIANT AG
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named MELIODERM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |