Drawing for STEPHAN

USPTO serial 79021707

STEPHAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3228142Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2007
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEPHAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILANA S HANDLER

PHILANA S HANDLER WHITHAM CURTIS CHRISTOFFERSON & COOK PC11491 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 340RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Meat processing machines, baking and confectionery processing machines; processing machines for the bread, bakery and fish industries; mixing, grinding and homogenizing machines for convenience foods, delicacies, dairy, sweets and chocolate, cosmetic, pharmacy and chemistry industries; plants, consisting of machines for producing and processing of food stuff; parts of the aforementioned machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 23, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 23, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 10, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 1, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Dec 14, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 20, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Nov 20, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 20, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance