Drawing for PIETRA ELITE

USPTO serial 79021724

PIETRA ELITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIETRA ELITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Building materials, not of metal; non-metallic rigid pipes for building; asphalt, pitch and bitumen; non-metallic transportable buildings; non-metallic monumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Advertising; business management; business administration; office functionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 29, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 27, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance