USPTO serial 79021733
AMMIRAGLIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMMIRAGLIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine, sparkling wines, liqueurs. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |