Drawing for RINGEXTRUDER

USPTO serial 79021794

RINGEXTRUDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 401
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RINGEXTRUDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NEAL E. FRIEDMAN

HAFT, VON PUTTKAMER, BERNGRUBER KARAKATSANISFRANZISKANERSTRASSE 38M NCHEN FED REP, 81669GERMAN DEMOCRATIC

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Extruders for processing plasticsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 20, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 2, 2007DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 5, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 20, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance