USPTO serial 79021796
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
VEGA TEKSTIL; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET; ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by VEGA TEKSTIL; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET; ANONIM SIRKETI
VEGA TEKSTIL; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET; ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by VEGA TEKSTIL; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET; ANONIM SIRKETI
VEGA TEKSTIL; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET; ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by VEGA TEKSTIL; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET; ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S. EGBERT
JOHN S EGBERT Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1314 Texas, 21st FloorHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Textile goods, namely, bed and table covers, bed sheets, bath linen, bed linen, coasters, curtains, flannels, blankets, table runners, handkerchiefs, household linen, towels, furniture fabrics, wall hangings made of textile fabrics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pullovers, skirts, dresses, blouses, jeans, trousers, jackets, coats, raincoats, anoraks, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, shorts, overalls, underclothing, bodices, brassieres, camisoles, underpants, dressing gowns, bathrobes, bathing suits, pyjamas, ski suits, headgear, namely hats, caps, knitted caps, berets, footwear namely, shoes, slippers, boots, sandals, beach shoes, sports shoes, lace boots and parts thereof, shoe parts, namely heelpieces, heels, footwear uppers, garter belts, ties, neckties, shawls, scarves, mufflers, neck scarves, sarongs, collars for dresses, muffs, suspenders, braces for clothing, garters, bandannas, headbands, clothing for babies, namely babies' diapers of textile | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 10, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| May 25, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2006 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| May 4, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 3, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |