USPTO serial 79021810
EXPERT NAILING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3288307Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2007
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPERT NAILING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Activities and services of a surgeon, namely, medical and surgery services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Synthes USA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Synthes GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Synthes GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Synthes GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by DePuy Synthes, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named EXPERT NAILING SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 6, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2010 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |