Drawing for T PHOENIX UNION THERMANIT

USPTO serial 79021811

T PHOENIX UNION THERMANIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3237636Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T PHOENIX UNION THERMANIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam D. Siegartel

Adam D. Siegartel Proskauer Rose LLPEleven Times SquareNEW YORK, NY 10036-8299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Additive chemical materials for welding and soldering, namely, metal welding and soldering flux and powderSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
006Metal materials for welding and soldering, namely, metal welding wires, strips and rodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Welding electrodes in form of rods and wires for electric welding machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 1, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 20, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 16, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 16, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 16, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 29, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 11, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 28, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 16, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 20, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance