USPTO serial 79021867
LEADIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3228147Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2007
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEADIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. David Starr
H. David Starr Nath, Goldberg & Meyer112 S. West StreetALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software applications for use in business-to-business networks with the purpose of managing sales processes, including the allocation of potential buyers to sales representatives and re-sellers of such information, and tracking the rest of the sales process; software for use in distributing, managing and exchanging information concerning sales leads | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 10, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |