Drawing for KELLY'S SNIPS

USPTO serial 79021885

KELLY'S SNIPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KELLY'S SNIPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed peanuts, potato crisps, salted almondsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
030Pop corn, pastry goods made with peanuts, starch-containing products for foodstuffs, also covered with peanut butterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
031Peanuts (fruits)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 4, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 20, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 20, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 20, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance