Drawing for O'STIN

USPTO serial 79021910

O'STIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with O'STIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; trunks and travelling bag; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
035Sales promotion (for others)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 15, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 1, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 29, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 11, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 8, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance