Drawing for FRR

USPTO serial 79022007

FRR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3373187Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2008
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Wolf

DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Fire extinguishing compositions; flame-retardant compositions; chemical substances for use in the field of fire protection and fire preventionSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Fire-extinguishing apparatus, namely, fire extinguishers; sheaths, bushing, sleeves, and cuffs, and insulating sheaths, bushing, sleeves, and cuffs for electric cables, electricity conduits for enclosing electric cablesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
017Fire-resistant sealing plugs made primarily of rubber; sealing material, namely, gaskets, packings, sheaths, bushing, sleeves, and cuffs made primarily of rubber designed to prevent the propagation of fire, fluid, or gas along cable and pipe lines or ducts; sealing rings, namely, rings of rubber for use as pipe connection seals, and sealing muffs, made of rubber designed to prevent the propagation of fire, fluid, or gas along cable and pipe lines or ducts; flexible pipes not of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Refractory materials, namely, mineral wool for use in buildings, and non-metallic fireproof bricks, blocks, concrete, and concrete building elements; non-metallic cable ducts not for electric circuitry; non-metallic pipes used for building constructionSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 14, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 25, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 29, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 26, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 29, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 28, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance