Drawing for Serial No. 79022041

USPTO serial 79022041

Serial No. 79022041

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340128Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79022041?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Clarke Holman and Harvey B. Jacobson, Simor L. Moskowitz, Allen S. Melser, Michael R. Slobasky, Marsha G. Gentner, Jonathan L. Scherer, George W. Lewis, William E. Player, and Nathaniel A. Humphries

AGUILAR & REVENGACONSELL DE CENT, 415 5º 1ªE BARCELONA, 08009SPAIN

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Edible oilsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 6, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Feb 27, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 27, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 28, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 27, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 22, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 18, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 30, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Mar 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance