USPTO serial 79022061
TIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3294199Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2007
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent E. Routman
Brent E. Routman Merchant & Gould, P.C.P.O. Box 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer[, ale, lager, stout, pilsner, porter and non-alcoholic [ malt beverages ] * beer *] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASIA PACIFIC BREWERIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ASIA PACIFIC BREWERIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ASIA PACIFIC BREWERIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TIGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 3, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |