USPTO serial 79022088
NOGAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3340130Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOGAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Lamport Hammitte
M ZARDI & CO SAVIA PIODA 6, CH-6900 LUGANOSWITZERLANDGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chocolate and chocolate goods, namely chocolate bars, chocolate candies, chocolate covered fruits, chocolate covered hazelnuts, chocolate topping, chocolate truffles, filled chocolate, milk chocolate | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |