Drawing for NUME

USPTO serial 79022099

NUME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, mirrors, picture framesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
024Textiles and textile goods, not included in other classes; bed and table coversSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Games and playthings; gymnastic articles not included in other classes; decorations for Christmas treesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 27, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 29, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 1, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance