Drawing for BLACK FEET NATIVE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE BY GIANLUCA LOPEZ

USPTO serial 79022121

BLACK FEET NATIVE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE BY GIANLUCA LOPEZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLACK FEET NATIVE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE BY GIANLUCA LOPEZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and alloys thereofSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
018Leather, imitation leather, saddlery articlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Clothing, footwear and hatsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 15, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 24, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 29, 2006RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jul 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 30, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance