USPTO serial 79022129
CD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Franklin Rothwell
JACOBACCI & PARTNERS SPAVIA SENATO, 8I MILANO, 20121ITALYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | BAGS, NAMELY, DUFFLE BAGS, SHOPPING BAGS, BOOK BAGS, TRAVELING BAGS, ATTACHE BAGS, CARRY-ON BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, RUCKSACKS, BELT BAGS, FANNY PACKS, HAND BAGS, ALL PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS, SHAVING BAGS AND CASES SOLD EMPTY, ALL IN LEATHER OR IMITATION LEATHER; LUGGAGE TRUNKS, WALLETS, BEAUTY CASES SOLD EMPTY, TOILETRY CASES SOLD EMPTY, KEY CASES, BRIEFCASES, DOCUMENT CASES, PURSES, LUGGAGE, WHEELED LUGGAGE, BUSINESS CARD CASES, SET FOR WRITING DESK, BOXES FOR WRITING PAPER, SHOE CASES, SHOE POLISH CASES, TIE RACKS, BUSINESS CARD CASES, NOTEBOOK BRIEFCASES, ALL IN LEATHER OR IMITATION LEATHER; UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS, WALKING STICKS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, KNIT SHIRTS, KNIT SWEATERS, KNIT PULLOVERS, JACKETS, BLAZERS, SKIRT, BLOUSES, CARDIGANS, BELTS, NECKWEAR, TIES, SWEATERS, SUITS, SHIRTS AND CHEMISES, T-SHIRTS, TROUSERS, DRESSES, CEREMONIAL DRESSES, SUITS, SHORTS, JEANS, SLACKS, SCARVES, BLAZERS, COATS, OVERCOATS, HALF COATS, WAISTCOATS, RAIN WEAR, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, SPORT COATS, TRACK SUITS, SWIMMING SUITS, BEACH WEAR, BATH ROBES, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, PAJAMAS, HANDKERCHIEFS, SOCKS, STOCKINGS; GLOVES, HATS, CAPS, SHOES, BOOTS AND SLIPPERS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |