Drawing for AIR JUMPING SALTELLA SULL'ARIA

USPTO serial 79022190

AIR JUMPING SALTELLA SULL'ARIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIR JUMPING SALTELLA SULL'ARIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear for gentlemen, ladies and children, in particular shoes, boots, slippersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Aug 19, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 19, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 28, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 28, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 19, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 4, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 28, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 28, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 4, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance