USPTO serial 79022208
THERMARIVM SPADESIGN&MANUFACTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THERMARIVM SPADESIGN&MANUFACTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, namely electric lighting fixtures; apparatus for heating, namely, Finnish sauna, bio sauna, herbal sauna and heated rooms; apparatus for steam generating, namely, aroma steam bath and traditional steam bath; apparatus for cooking, namely, electric stoves; apparatus for refrigerating, namely cold rooms; apparatus for drying, namely, clothes dryers; apparatus for ventilating, namely, ventilating exhaust fans and ventilating fans for commercial and industrial use; apparatus for water supply, namely, water-pipes, tanks, ornamental fountains and ice fountains; apparatus for sanitary purposes, namely, walk through alternating warm and cold foot basins, showers such as round showers, snail shell showers, rock showers, whirlpools, foot whirlpools, toilets, water closets, faucets, sinks, bidets and massage apparatus | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, asphalt, briquette, beams, building timber, building glass, quartz, concrete, busts, floor tiles, clay, marble, mosaics for building, mortar for building, sandstone for building, wall linings, alabaster glass, wood boards, soffits; non-metallic rigid pipes for building, namely, branching pipes; asphalt, pitch and bitumen asphalt; non-metallic transportable buildings, namely, swimming pools; non-metallic monuments of stone, concrete or marble, namely, statues, figurines, and statuettes, synthetic foam material, namely, polyurethane foam and expended polystyrene; glass-fiber reinforced plastic materials, namely, unsaturated polyester resin with fiberglass reinforcement, unsaturated polyester resin and marble sand; fettled and painted surfaces | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Building construction and repair, namely, building industry, architectural consultation, engineering, construction drafting, technical project studies, construction information, repair information, design concept, design, plumbing; installation of electrical systems and electrical heating systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |