Drawing for ELMOB ELEKTRONIK MOBILYALARI

USPTO serial 79022238

ELMOB ELEKTRONIK MOBILYALARI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELMOB ELEKTRONIK MOBILYALARI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020PLASMA/LCD Stands - TV/CRT Stands - Wall Mounts - CD/DVD Cabins, iron tablesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 21, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 20, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 15, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 4, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance