Drawing for INTENSITY

USPTO serial 79022252

INTENSITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3242690Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2007
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTENSITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine B. Redfield

Christine B. Redfield Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Life jackets, personal flotation devices, buoyancy compensator jackets and buoyancy compensator belts for use by diversSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 12, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 5, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 22, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 22, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 15, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 17, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 21, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 22, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Nov 21, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Nov 21, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 8, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Nov 8, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 8, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 5, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 4, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance