Drawing for SAB WABCO

USPTO serial 79022296

SAB WABCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAB WABCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN A CLIFFORD

JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Lubricating oils, and lubricating oils for compressors for machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 22, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 7, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 7, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 4, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 28, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 4, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance