Drawing for WILD WINGS

USPTO serial 79022355

WILD WINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LUKEN, BONNIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILD WINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Garden furniture; hanging baskets; furniture covers; bird tables and bird boxes; lawn edging; hooks, clips and fastenings, all for use with the aforementioned goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
021Bird feeders; plant pots; gardening gloves; plant propagators; dust bins; watering cansSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
031Animal food; bird food; moss for hanging basketsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 17, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 4, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 19, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 19, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 4, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 21, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 23, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 4, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance