Drawing for EUHREKA

USPTO serial 79022400

EUHREKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EUHREKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software; computer programs; optical and magnetic data carriersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
035Consultancy in relation to personnel management and personnel matters; personnel and wages administration; business management and business resources management; temporary assignment of employees; employment agencies; personnel selection and recruitment; electronic data processingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Computer programming and development, design, updating and installation of computer software; consultancy in relation to the installation, development and applications of computer softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 15, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 18, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 11, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance