Drawing for ARVEDI

USPTO serial 79022404

ARVEDI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318469Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARVEDI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Steel and alloys thereof; steel sheets, steel-strips, billets and pipesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Steel and other metal casting, rolling and processing machinery being structural parts of steel plantsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Technical consultancy in the field of steel industry in the nature of providing consultancy for steel processingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 10, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 13, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 30, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 1, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 11, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance