Drawing for SOUNDFIELD

USPTO serial 79022406

SOUNDFIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3329618Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 6, 2007
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUNDFIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Slafsky

John L. Slafsky WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Semi-conductor components, namely, transistors, diodes, memories, sensors, ] integrated circuits, [ wafers; components of the aforesaid goods, namely, their casings; and hybrid systems comprised of semiconductor chips, integrated circuits and sensors; software and software systems, namely, computer operating systems software ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 10, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 24, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 24, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 13, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 13, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 13, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 11, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 21, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 5, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 22, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 30, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 20, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 20, 2008LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jul 3, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 28, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Jun 27, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
May 8, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 18, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 27, 2007LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED
Dec 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 11, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance