USPTO serial 79022459
VIVE LE JARDIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVE LE JARDIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products and grains not included in other classes; live animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; natural seeds, plants and flowers; animal foodstuffs, malt | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |