Drawing for QUADMAU

USPTO serial 79022491

QUADMAU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3202421Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 2007
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUADMAU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather A. Dunn

Heather A. Dunn DLA Piper LLP (US)555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microprocessors, particularly digital signal processors; decoders, particularly television decoders, video decoders and audio decoders; semi-conductors; semi-conductor components, particularly transistors, diodes, memories; integrated circuits; hybrid integrated circuits; silicon wafers; structured semi-conductor wafers; apparatus for recording, transmitting or reproducing images and sound, particularly video recorders, audio recorders, video reproduction apparatus and audio reproduction apparatus; apparatus for amplifying of signals, particularly sound amplifiers; speakers; audio speaker and loudspeaker unit systems; stored software for the purpose of providing data and control for video and audio data processing and operation of integrated circuits; downloadable software for the purpose of providing data and control for video and audio data processing and operation of integrated circuits; data processors; machine-readable blank data carriers; machine-readable data carrier containing stored typographic typefaces; parts of all aforesaid goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design and development of semi-conductor components, microprocessors, signal processors, microcontrollers, electric and electronic circuitsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 21, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 21, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 22, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 20, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 23, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 11, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance