Drawing for MI-TOUCH

USPTO serial 79022549

MI-TOUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MI-TOUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical and veterinary medicinal preparations, sanitary preparations for medical purposes, dietetic preparations for medical use, food for babies, plasters and dressing materials, materials for fillings and impressions (for teeth), disinfectants, preparations for pest extermination, fungicides, herbicidesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
010Surgical, medical, orthodontic and veterinary devices and instruments as well as artificial limbs, eyes and teeth, orthopedic articles, suture materialsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 24, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 11, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance