USPTO serial 79022568
SKY BEACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3237656Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2007
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKY BEACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
70173 Stuttgart, DE
70173 Stuttgart, DE
70173 Stuttgart, DE
70199 Stuttgart, DE
70199 Stuttgart, DE
70199 Stuttgart, DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROY S. GORDET
ROY S GORDET LAW OFFICE OF ROY S GORDET98 BATTERY ST STE 601SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Discotheque services; [ coaching and training services in the fields of dance, social networking, and business networking; entertainment services, namely, presentation of live performances by musical groups, actors, lecturers, and comedians ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Bar services, catering and serving food and drink | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lothar Müller
- Other trademarks owned by Lothar Müller
- Other trademarks owned by Lothar Müller
- Other trademarks owned by Jan Langen
- Other trademarks owned by Jan Langen
- Other trademarks owned by Jan Langen
- Other trademarks owned by Müller, Lothar
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named SKY BEACH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 24, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 20, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |