USPTO serial 79022685
CACCIATORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3291132Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2007
- Examiner
- GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CACCIATORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paolo A. Strino
Paolo A. Strino Gibbons P.C.One Penn Plaza, 37th FloorNew York, NY 10119-3701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Small "hunting style" Italian sausages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2014 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |