USPTO serial 79022754
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
XIAMEN QING HONG; ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
Haicang; XIAMEN, CN
Other trademarks owned by XIAMEN QING HONG; ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
XIAMEN QING HONG; ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
Haicang; XIAMEN, CN
Other trademarks owned by XIAMEN QING HONG; ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
XIAMEN QING HONG; ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
Haicang; XIAMEN, CN
Other trademarks owned by XIAMEN QING HONG; ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand tools for brick laying, namely trowels; knife steels, namely, butcher knives, carpet knives, carving knives, chef knives, fishing knives, folding knives, household knives, hunting knives, knives for hobby use, knives of precious metal, paring knives, pocket knives, putty knives, razor knives, scaling knives, sport knives, table knives, throwing knives, utility knives, vegetable knives, working knives; scissors; penknives; hunting knives; vegetable knives; cleavers; gardening trowels; pruning shears; paring knives; machetes; hand tools, namely planing blades; non-electric can openers; hand tools, namely scrapers; hand-operated meat choppers; table cutlery, namely knives, forks and spoons; cutlery; hand tools, namely foundry ladles; silver plated tableware, namely knives, forks and spoons; hand-operated vegetable choppers; hand-operated wire cutters; hand tools, namely single-piston, dual-piston, or telescopic rams; hand operated tools for gardening use, namely spades and hoes; electric or non-electric razors; hand tools, namely saws; butcher knives; carpet knives; carving knives; chef knives; fishing knives; folding knives; household knives; hunting knives; knives for hobby use; knives of precious metal; paring knives; pocket knives; putty knives; razor knives; scaling knives; sport knives; table knives; throwing knives; utility knives; vegetable knives; working knives; electric or non-electric nail clippers; hand tools, namely spanners; hand tools, namely dies; tongs, namely fire tongs; kitchen utensils, namely spoons | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Electric roasters; gas-powered roasters; electric hot air cooking ovens; gas-powered hot air cooking ovens; framework of metal for cooking ovens; baker's ovens; roasting jacks in the nature of machines for turning a spit on which meat is roasted | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Pot lids; basins, namely receptacles in the nature of earthenware basins, hand basins, and wash basins; cooking pot sets; cooking skewers, of metal; cutting boards for the kitchen; frying pans; grill supports, namely grill covers; cooking utensils, namely non-electric griddles; salt shakers, not of precious metal; containers for household or kitchen use except in precious metal; epergnes, not of precious metal; kitchen utensils not of precious metal, namely, graters, sieves, skimmers, spatulas, strainers, tongs, turners; tableware, namely scoops; plant and flower baskets, for domestic use, not of precious metal; knife rests for the table; trivets; stew pans; cauldrons; cooking pots; non-electric pressure cookers; non-electric hot pots; non-electric deep fryers; corkscrews; tableware not of precious metal, namely serving spoons, slotted spoons, mixing spoons and serving forks, not of precious metal; soup bowls, not of precious metal; dishes, not of precious metal; fitted-picnic baskets sold together as a unit with dishes; tableware other than knives, forks and spoons not of precious metal, namely serving tongs; lunch boxes; basins being bowls; porcelain ware for domestic use, namely basins which are bowls, bowls, plates, pots, serving spoons, slotted spoons, mixing spoons, serving forks, storage jars, cookie jars, food preserving jars; jars for jams and jellies, utensil crocks, non-electric kettles; enameled and plastic utensils for household purposes, namely basins which are bowls, bowls, plates, pots, cups; glassware for domestic use, namely cups, plates, pots, storage jars; cabarets being trays, not of precious metal; porcelain and chinaware for domestic use, namely basins, bowls, plates, pots, serving spoons, slotted spoons, mixing spoons, serving forks, storage jars, cookie jars, food preserving jars; jars for jams and jellies, utensil crocks, non-electric kettles, and casserole dishes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 31, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |