Drawing for ARGANZA

USPTO serial 79022960

ARGANZA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARGANZA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
029Meat, fish, poultry and game, meat extracts, preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and dairy products; edible oils and fatsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 16, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 14, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 25, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance