Drawing for AROMA DEL PALAZZETTO

USPTO serial 79022964

AROMA DEL PALAZZETTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3272568Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2007
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AROMA DEL PALAZZETTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

REBECCAH GAN

REBECCAH GAN YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison St., Ste. 500Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Hotel and restaurant servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 20, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Nov 7, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 7, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 2, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 26, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 31, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 11, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Sep 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
May 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 25, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance