USPTO serial 79023002
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslye B Davidson
HIEBSCH + PEEGE AG PATENTANWäLTE56, VORDERGASSEPOST BOX 226CH SCHAFFHAUSEN, 8201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for manufacturing advanced ceramics and ceramics with a neutral reaction by the human body for use in medicine, namely, aluminum oxides, and zircon oxides | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Artificial members and parts thereof for surgical and dental implantation made of plastics, metals and ceramics with a neutral reaction by the human body, namely, prosthetic arms, thighs and shank bones, spinal vertebrae, hand bones,hand joints, arm joints, hip joints, knee joints, foot and shoulder joints; jaw bone prostheses, teeth prostheses;dental prostheses, namely, dental crowns and dental bridges; medical apparatus and parts thereof of plastics,metals and ceramics with a neutral reaction by the human body as implants, namely, heart pacemakers, artificial hearts, medical liquid dosing pumps; apparatus for medical examination and analysis and parts thereof, namely,apparatus for the dialysis of blood, blood serum and blood compounds totally or partly of plastic and metals or ceramics with a neutral reaction by the human body; apparatus for the heart and circulation, namely, heart pumps totally or partly of plastics, metals or ceramics with a neutral reaction by the human body; and apparatus for anesthesia,totally or partly of plastics, metals or ceramics with a neutral reaction by the human body, namely, ventilator sand anesthesia machines for use in patient care | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2006 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |