Drawing for TAMARINDA

USPTO serial 79023011

TAMARINDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAMARINDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products and grains not included in other classes; fresh fruits and vegetables; seeds, bulbs, tubers, rootstocks, cuttings and other material for the propagation of agricultural, horticultural and forestry growth (by parthenogenesis or not); rootstocks for the improvement of aforesaid growth and grafting material, not included in other classes; natural plants and flowersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 24, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 16, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 10, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 25, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance