Drawing for UNILECT

USPTO serial 79023051

UNILECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3252003Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 12, 2007
Examiner
OTT, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNILECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005[ Hydrogels for medical use, namely, hydrogel in sheet form for wound dressing, hydrogel for the treatment of burns, and hydrogel for use with medical electrodes ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Electrodes for medical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 22, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 19, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 19, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 12, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 1, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 201371.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 26, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 7, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Jun 7, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 3, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 26, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 15, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 6, 2013RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
May 6, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 17, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance