Drawing for HARTEC

USPTO serial 79023097

HARTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3256654Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2007
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria C.H. Lin

ALBERT-ROßHAUPTER-STRASSE 65 HANSMANN & VOGESERPATENT- UND RECHTSANWäLTE, 81369 MüNCHENGERMAN DEMOCRATIC

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the manufacture of surface coatings, namely, machines for manufacture of surface coatings by plasma treatmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Treatment of materials, namely, surface coating of metal, ceramic, glass and plastic materials and plasma coatingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 6, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 31, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 13, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance