USPTO serial 79023142
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
CONTEC Maschinenbau &; Entwicklungstechnik GmbH
57518 Alsdorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by CONTEC Maschinenbau &; Entwicklungstechnik GmbH
CONTEC Maschinenbau & Entwicklungstechnik GmbH
57518 Alsdorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by CONTEC Maschinenbau & Entwicklungstechnik GmbH
CONTEC Maschinenbau &; Entwicklungstechnik GmbH
57518 Alsdorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by CONTEC Maschinenbau &; Entwicklungstechnik GmbH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrical machine tools for sawing, grinding, shotblasting, sandblasting, milling, napping, derusting, descaling and grooving, as well as for removing of floor coverings, markings, thermoplastics and paints, and parts therefor in the nature of tooling inserts for milling, grinding, planing, sawing and polishing; electrical vacuum cleaners for removing dust in the field of construction, and parts therefor in the nature of suction hoods, hoses, bags for collecting of dust and other dirt and filter cartridges; * all the aforesaid goods not for use for or in connection with the personalisation of documents or other forms, including but not exclusively plastic cards, passes or delivery notes, whereby a variety of technologies can be applied, including, but not exclusively, laser engraving and/or laser milling, embedding and/or laser miling, embedding and/or the personalisation of smart cards * | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |